Back to Kemp Acoustics Home
Next: Results
Up: Multimodal radiation impedance of
Previous: Multimodal radiation impedance of
  Contents
Consider a rectangular duct of half widths and terminated in an
infinite baffle, as shown in figure 3.4.
Figure 3.4:
Geometry of infinitely flanged rectangular duct
|
Expressing (3.13) in rectangular coordinates for a rectangular duct
of half-widths and gives:
|
(3.26) |
where
|
(3.27) |
and
|
(3.28) |
with
|
(3.29) |
|
(3.30) |
|
(3.31) |
Changing variables as in Swenson et al. [49] and Levine [51] to
,
,
, and
the integral becomes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.32) |
where
|
(3.33) |
The quadruple integral can now be reduced to a double integral
by performing integration by and analytically.
The first step is to expand the cosines in equations (3.29)
and (3.30):
The second and third terms go to zero
since we are integrating over a symmetric interval in .
Performing integration gives:
The integral for the impedance is then:
|
(3.36) |
Changing variables to and means that the radiation
impedance is expressed in terms of the dimensionless variables and :
|
(3.37) |
Note that if we put
into equation
(3.35) we obtain
|
(3.38) |
The radiation impedance from equation (3.37) is then identical to
the radiation impedance of a rectangular piston in an
infinite baffle [47,48,49,50,51] (note that most authors
have used and as widths rather than half widths). Equation
(3.37) has a singularity at the origin if and
which must be removed if the radiation impedance is to be calculated by
numerical integration. To do this the integral is first split into two parts:
where
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.40) |
The first part is non-singular and the singularity in the second half may be
removed by integration, giving:
Equation (3.41) may be evaluated by numerical integration to
provide the radiation impedance.
Back to Kemp Acoustics Home
Next: Results
Up: Multimodal radiation impedance of
Previous: Multimodal radiation impedance of
  Contents
Jonathan Kemp
2003-03-24